New paper published in PNAS Nexus

Congratulations to Benjy on his paper “Identifying content-invariant neural signatures of perceptual vividness” which is now published in PNAS Nexus

The study used data from different MEG and fMRI experiments to ask how the vividness of our perceptual experiences is encoded in the brain. We showed that there are signals in the brain that keep track of perceptual vividness independently from what is actually being perceived. This suggests there may be higher-order brain regions monitoring the reliability of our perceptual representations, and that this may contribute to our experience of vividness.

The paper is explained in more detail in Benjy’s Twitter thread.

Steve awarded Francis Crick Medal and Lecture

Steve has been awarded the Francis Crick Medal and Lecture by the Royal Society, “for tackling foundational questions about the neurobiology of conscious experience and advancing our understanding of the neural and computational basis of metacognition.” There will be an in-person lecture in autumn 2023 - watch this space!

MetaLab presentations over the summer - ASSC, CPC and CCN

Several lab members gave talk and poster presentations over the summer, at the Association of the Scientific Study of Consciousness meeting in NYC, the Computational Psychiatry conference in Dublin, and the Computational Cognitive Neuroscience conference in Oxford.

A special mention to Wiktoria Luczak who gave her first ever talk about her undergraduate thesis work (on modeling metacognitive distortions) at CCN - congratulations!

A selection of posters is included below.

Podcasts and media coverage of work on reality monitoring

Nadine has been busy giving interviews on her recent Nature Communications paper showing that subjective signal strength distinguishes reality from imagination.

Here’s a selection of links, enjoy!

New paper published in Nature Communications

Congratulations to Nadine on her paper “Subjective signal strength distinguishes reality from imagination” which is now published in Nature Communications.

The study used computer models, online experiments and brain imaging to investigate how people judge whether something is real or imaginary. We found that people were surprisingly bad at knowing whether what they saw was real, or just part of their imagination. These results suggest that, counterintuitively, there is no categorical difference between imagination and reality; instead, it is a difference in degree, not in kind.

For more details check out Nadine’s Twitter thread on the results.

Steve appointed Fellow of Canadian Institute for Advanced Research

Steve has been appointed a Fellow of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, in the Brain, Mind and Consciousness Program.

CIFAR is a Canadian-based global research organisation that brings together teams of top researchers from around the world. There are only 20 Fellows worldwide in the Brain, Mind and Consciousness programme. The CIFAR programme will provide funds for the MetaLab’s research into consciousness and metacognition.

Exciting times for consciousness research!

https://www.ucl.ac.uk/pals/news/2023/jan/professor-steve-fleming-appointed-fellow-canadian-institute-advanced-research

Visit to Westminster Academy school

Steve visited Westminster Academy school to talk about what it’s like to be an academic and cognitive neuroscientist and discuss the science of self-awareness. Lots of great questions, the future is in safe hands!

New paper on social confidence in Nature Communications

Our paper on “Neurocomputational mechanisms of confidence in self and others” is now out in Nature Communications. Congratulations Dan!

This project had a long gestation, being one of the last Steve designed and ran as a postdoc with Nathaniel Daw at NYU in 2014 (!)

A thread from Dan explaining the paper is here:

New paper on consciousness in Nature Reviews Psychology

With Hakwan Lau, Matthias Michel and Joe Le Doux, we have written a recent opinion piece in Nature Reviews Psychology entitled “The mnemonic basis of subjective experience” outling how implicit knowledge of a quality space may support the capacity to say what an experience is “like” (a relational judgment between two points in perceptual space). This is exciting because it captures the famous “what it is like” definition of phenomenology in computational terms, and leads to testable experiments about the functional role and neural implementation of conscious processing.

MetaLab at ASSC

A number of the MetaLab visited Amsterdam for ASSC25 for all things consciousness and metacognition. It was great to be back in person with colleagues after 2 years of the pandemic. Thanks to the organisers for putting together a brilliant week in a fantastic location!

Astrid, Sucharit, Benjy and Yuena all gave poster presentations (you can download their posters below).

Steve and Sucharit gave a meta-d’ tutorial (code here), and Steve participated in the Great Consciousness Debate representing higher-order theories.

To cap it all Steve, Megan Peters, Doby Rahnev and Lucie Charles organised the inaugural Perceptual Metacognition Satellite meeting with keynotes from Pascal Mamassian and Janneke Jehee.

What a week!

The lab in the time of ShPL

Steve took Shared Parental Leave (ShPL) for 3 months with his baby daughter Isla, and the MetaLab are grateful for Marco stepping into the breach and keeping everyone on the rails!

UCL Neuroscience Symposium

Steve gave one of the plenary lectures at the UCL Neuroscience Symposium - the first after the pandemic, and entitled “Reconnecting UCL Neuroscience: From Cells to Society”. It was a great event, with some stunning talks from across the faculty, including brilliant student prize talks.

Alexane presented her poster on her Masters project with Nadine, and got some very useful feedback - well done Alexane!